Quadro 3000M vs Quadro GP100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Quadro GP100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
Quadro GP100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1442MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (732.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3344 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Quadro GP100
+2293%
10340
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1304 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1442 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
715 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
732.2GB/s
Render Config
5
SM Count
56
240
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
24 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.4 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
323.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.67 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.34 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.168 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
GP100
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
15.3 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
610 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
6.0
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
