Quadro 3000M vs Radeon Instinct MI25
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI25 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 300W)
Radeon Instinct MI25 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (436.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3856 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 3000M
432
Radeon Instinct MI25
+2744%
12290
Graphics Card
Feb 2011
Release Date
Jun 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1400 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
625 MHz
Memory Clock
852 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
436.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
5
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
4.500 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
18.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
432.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
36.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
Vega 10
N12E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Fermi
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
