Quadro 2000 vs RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1627MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 62W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
RTX A1000 Embedded
+1288%
6664
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1192 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
2048
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
60W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
GA107S
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
Unknown
238 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
