Quadro 2000 vs Data Center GPU Max 1350
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 96GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 450W)
Data Center GPU Max 1350 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1550MHz
More VRAM (96GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (2458GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
14144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
480
Data Center GPU Max 1350
+9158%
44440
Graphics Card
Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
750 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1550 MHz
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
96GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
2458GB/s
Render Config
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
14336
32
TMUs
896
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
896
-
RT Cores
112
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
Theoretical Performance
5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1389 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.44 TFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.44 TFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.44 TFLOPS
Board Design
62W
TDP
450W
250 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GF106
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
40 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
100 billion
238 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
