Opteron X2 170 vs EPYC Embedded 8324P
We compared two server CPUs: Opteron X2 170 with 2 cores 2GHz and EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
Opteron X2 170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (110W vs 180W)
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 18 years and 1 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 400)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 2GHz)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 90nm)
Score
General Parameters
Aug 2005
Release Date
Sep 2023
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Denmark
Core Architecture
Siena
AMD Socket 939
Socket
AMD Socket SP6
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Integrated Graphics
N/A
Opteron X2 (Denmark)
Generation
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Package
0.233 billions
Transistor Count
35.5 billions
90 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
110 W
Power Consumption
180 W
65 °C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
-
Foundry
TSMC
199 mm²
Die Size
4x73 mm²
-
I/O Process Size
6 nm
-
I/O Die Size
397 mm²
CPU Performance
2 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.65 GHz
0
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
2
Total Core Count
32
2
Total Thread Count
64
200 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
10.0
Multiplier
26.5
128 KB
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB per core
-
L3 Cache
128 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
2
SMP
1
Memory Parameters
DDR1-400
Memory Types
DDR5-4800
2
Max Memory Channels
6
No
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
-
PCIe Version
5
-
PCIe Lanes
96
