Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB vs RTX A4500 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Lower TDP (15W vs 80W)
RTX A4500 Embedded 's Advantages
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 68.29GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB
1280
RTX A4500 Embedded
+1017%
14310
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tegra
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
16GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
68.29GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s
Render Config
8
SM Count
46
1024
Shading Units
5888
32
TMUs
184
16
ROPs
96
32
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
2.560 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1280 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
640.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
15W
TDP
80W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA10B
GPU Name
GA104
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
8 nm
Unknown
Transistors
17.4 billion
Unknown
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.6
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
