Home Comparison GeForce RTX 5090 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

GeForce RTX 5090 vs Moore Threads MTT S3000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Boost Clock2407MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 448.0GB/s)
17664 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 575W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5090 +573%
104800
Moore Threads MTT S3000
15560

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 50
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2017 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
2407 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.79TB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
170
SM Count
-
21760
Shading Units
4096
680
TMUs
256
176
ROPs
256
680
Tensor Cores
-
170
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

423.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
1637 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
104.8 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
104.8 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
1.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

575W
TDP
250W
950 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GB202
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GB202-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
92.2 billion
Transistors
22 billion
750 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.4
Vulkan
1.4
12.0
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net