GeForce 210 vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (31W vs 105W)
FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.33GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
FireStream 9170
+1174%
497
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
400 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
320
8
TMUs
16
4
ROPs
16
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
105W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
RV670
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
4.1
