GeForce 210 vs TITAN V
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM GeForce 210 and 12GB VRAM TITAN V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 210 's Advantages
Lower TDP (31W vs 250W)
TITAN V 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (651.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
5104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce 210
39
TITAN V
+38105%
14900
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce 210
285
TITAN V
+4537%
13217
Graphics Card
Oct 2009
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
12GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
651.3GB/s
Render Config
2
SM Count
80
16
Shading Units
5120
8
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
465.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.80 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.90 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
7.450 TFLOPS
Board Design
31W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT218
GPU Name
GV100
GT218-300-A2
GPU Variant
GV100-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
