FireStream 9250 vs RTX A400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
32 additional rendering cores
RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1762MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
RTX A400
+170%
2706
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Apr 2024
FireStream
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1417 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
800
Shading Units
768
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA107
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
