FireStream 9250 vs Radeon RX 560 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Radeon RX 560 XT
+339%
4394
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2019
FireStream
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1074 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
28
800
Shading Units
1792
40
TMUs
112
16
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.1
Shader Model
6.4
