FireStream 9250 vs TITAN V
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 12GB VRAM TITAN V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
TITAN V 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (651.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
4320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
TITAN V
+1390%
14900
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2017
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
651.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
80
800
Shading Units
5120
40
TMUs
320
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
640
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
465.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.80 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.90 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.450 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GV100
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GV100-400-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.0
4.1
Shader Model
6.6