FireStream 9250 vs P102 101
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 10GB VRAM P102 101 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
P102 101 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1670MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
P102 101
+969%
10690
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2018
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1670 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2002 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
25
800
Shading Units
3200
40
TMUs
200
16
ROPs
80
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
133.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
334.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
167.0 GFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.69 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
334.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GP102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GP102-101-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
4.1
Shader Model
6.4