FireStream 9250 vs CMP 70HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM CMP 70HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 70HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (608.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
3040 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
CMP 70HX
+971%
10710
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jan 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1365 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
608.3GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
30
800
Shading Units
3840
40
TMUs
120
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
120
-
RT Cores
30
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.28 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
167.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.71 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.71 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
167.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 12-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
GA104
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
GA104-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.8