FireStream 9250 vs CMP 50HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
CMP 50HX
+1007%
11070
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
FireStream
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
320bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
TU102
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.8