Home Comparison FireStream 9250 vs Arc B580

FireStream 9250 vs Arc B580

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 12GB VRAM Arc B580 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 190W)
Arc B580 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock2670MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (456.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Arc B580 +1267%
13670

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Dec 2024
FireStream
Generation
Battlemage
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2670 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2670 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
456.0GB/s

Render Config

10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
2560
40
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
18 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
213.6 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
427.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.34 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.67 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.709 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a 3x DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
BMG-G21
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
SRPMF
TeraScale
Architecture
Xe2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
19.6 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
272 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net