FireStream 9250 vs Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
1000
Arc A750
+1620%
17200
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
FireStream
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
993 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
800
Shading Units
3584
40
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
DG2-512
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
