FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTS 240 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireStream 9250 's Advantages
688 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTS 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (70.40GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
Lower TDP (120W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireStream 9250
+175%
1000
GeForce GTS 240 OEM
363
Graphics Card
Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2009
FireStream
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
993 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
63.55GB/s
Bandwidth
70.40GB/s
Render Config
10
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
800
Shading Units
112
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
25.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.80 GTexel/s
1000 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
362.9 GFLOPS
200.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
120W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV770
GPU Name
G92B
RV770 PRO
GPU Variant
G92-240-B1
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.1
Shader Model
4.0