Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4064 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+22589%
16790
Quadro NVS 320M
74
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
4096
Shading Units
32
256
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
32
RT Cores
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
