CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 52% (1410MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 336.6GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+136%
12630
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5345
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
3GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
2880
280
TMUs
240
128
ROPs
48
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK180
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.175
8.0
CUDA
3.5
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
