CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 1630
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1630 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
3968 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1630 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (1785MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+590%
12630
GeForce GTX 1630
1828
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1740 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
8
4480
Shading Units
512
280
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.56 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.12 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.828 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 2.01x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
TU117
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
TU117-150-KA-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
