CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1770MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+132%
12630
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5437
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Feb 2019
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
24
4480
Shading Units
1536
280
TMUs
96
128
ROPs
48
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
84.96 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
169.9 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.87 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.437 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
169.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
TU116
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
TU116-400-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
