CMP 170HX vs Radeon RX 560 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1410MHz vs 1226MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+187%
12630
Radeon RX 560 XT
4394
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Mar 2019
Mining GPUs
Generation
Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1074 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1226 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
28
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1792
280
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.23 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
137.3 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.394 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.394 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
274.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Polaris 10 LE1
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4