CMP 170HX vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
4400 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+15687%
12630
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2010
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
80
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
M93
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.1