CMP 170HX vs T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1410MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3584 additional rendering cores
T1000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+405%
12630
T1000
2500
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1065 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
14
4480
Shading Units
896
280
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
TU117
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
12 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
7.5
N/A
Shader Model
6.8
