CMP 170HX vs FirePro V7900
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
FirePro V7900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+580%
12630
FirePro V7900
1856
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1280
280
TMUs
80
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Cayman
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
5.0