CMP 170HX vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4464 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+27966%
12630
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 2
45
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
2
4480
Shading Units
16
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G96C
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
