CMP 170HX vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
4360 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+6478%
12630
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
192
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
120
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
45W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
RV630
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
