CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTX 260
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4288 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 260 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+2547%
12630
GeForce GTX 260
477
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2008
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
896MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
448bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
24
4480
Shading Units
192
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
28
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
36.86 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
476.9 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.62 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
182W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GT200
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G200-100-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
65 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.3
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
