Home Comparison CMP 170HX vs FireGL V8600

CMP 170HX vs FireGL V8600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
4160 additional rendering cores
FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (159W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +2770%
12630
FireGL V8600
440

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR4
4096bit
Memory Bus
512bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
320
280
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
159W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
R600
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net