CMP 170HX vs Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 124.0GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1750MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+369%
12630
Arc A310
2688
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Oct 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
768
280
TMUs
32
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
30W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
DG2-128
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Ampere
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6
