Home Comparison CMP 170HX vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

CMP 170HX vs GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 128MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
4464 additional rendering cores
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX +27966%
12630
GeForce 9400 GT Rev. 3
45

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
Jun 2012
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
2
4480
Shading Units
16
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.356 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.712 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.86 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
GT218
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net