Arc A750 vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Arc A750 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Arc A750
+3360%
17200
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Oct 2022
Release Date
Nov 2007
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2050 MHz
Base Clock
-
2400 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
3584
Shading Units
320
224
TMUs
16
112
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
28
RT Cores
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
268.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
537.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
34.41 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.20 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
105W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
RV670
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
55 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
