Home Comparison A10G vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

A10G vs Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM A10G and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

A10G 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1710MHz vs 1620MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 112.1GB/s)
8192 additional rendering cores
Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
A10G +849%
31520
Quadro T2000 Max Q
3318
Blender
A10G +675%
3589
Quadro T2000 Max Q
463

Graphics Card

Apr 2021
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1320 MHz
Base Clock
1200 MHz
1710 MHz
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
1563 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
600.2GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
16
9216
Shading Units
1024
288
TMUs
64
96
ROPs
32
288
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

164.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
492.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
31.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
31.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
985.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
8-pin EPS
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA102
GPU Name
TU117
GA102-890-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
28.3 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
628 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net