3D Rage IIC PCI vs GeForce 9400 GT PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (256GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (12.80GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Aug 2008
Rage 2
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
256MB
SDR
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
-
Shading Units
16
1
TMUs
8
1
ROPs
4
-
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
G96C
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Tesla
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
-
Shader Model
4.0
