3D Rage IIC PCI vs A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
A2 's Advantages
Released 24 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
Nov 2021
Rage 2
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
83 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
16GB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
10
-
Shading Units
1280
1
TMUs
40
1
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VGA
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
GA107
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
-
Rage 2
Architecture
Ampere
UMC
Foundry
Samsung
500 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
Unknown
39 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
-
Shader Model
6.6
