3D Rage IIC PCI vs FireGL V8600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2MB VRAM 3D Rage IIC PCI and 1024MB VRAM FireGL V8600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8600 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 0.664GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Apr 1997
Release Date
May 2007
Rage 2
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
83 MHz
Memory Clock
868 MHz
Memory
2MB
Memory Size
1024MB
SDR
Memory Type
GDDR4
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
0.664GB/s
Bandwidth
111.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
-
Shading Units
320
1
TMUs
16
1
ROPs
16
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
60.00 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.01 GPixel/s
60.00 MTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.01 GTexel/s
-
FP32 (float)
440.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
159W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x VGA
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Rage IIC
GPU Name
R600
Rage IIC PCI
(215R2PZUA21)
GPU Variant
R600 V8600
Rage 2
Architecture
TeraScale
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
500 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.005 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
39 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
5.0
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
Shader Model
4.0
