Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Passive to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (260W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1070
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Passive +2211%
14.38 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1305 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
72
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
4608
80
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
449.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.75 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.38 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
449.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
GPU Variant
TU102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Board Design

800W
TDP
260W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy