Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM Radeon RX 7950 XTX and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 7950 XTX 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 255% (3300MHz vs 930MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 355W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 7950 XTX +8418%
81.1 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Dec 2013
Navi III
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2200 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
3300 MHz
Boost Clock
930 MHz
2500 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
960.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
96
Compute Units
8
6144
Shading Units
512
384
TMUs
32
192
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
96
RT Cores
-
256 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

633.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
1267 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
162.2 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
81.10 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
2.534 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Navi 31
GPU Name
Cape Verde
Navi 31 XTX+
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
57.7 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

355W
TDP
65W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1a 2x DisplayPort 2.1 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy