Home GPU Comparison AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

AMD FireStream 9270 vs AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 255 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9270 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 255 OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock930MHz
Lower TDP (65W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireStream 9270 +26%
1.2 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 255 OEM
0.952 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2013
FireStream
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
930 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
10
Compute Units
8
800
Shading Units
512
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.88 GPixel/s
30.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.76 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1200 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
952.3 GFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.52 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV770
GPU Name
Cape Verde
RV770 XT
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRX
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.956 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
256 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy