Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon E9550 MXM +56%
5.834 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2016
Release Date
May 2015
Embedded
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1120 MHz
Base Clock
-
1266 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
36
Compute Units
32
2304
Shading Units
2048
144
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

40.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
182.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
5.834 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
5.834 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
364.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Amethyst
Ellesmere XT
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
5 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Board Design

95W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy