Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +174%
3.656 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
3 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy