Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q

We compared a Professional market GPU: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and a Mobile platform GPU: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1785MHz vs 1125MHz)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile +58%
3.656 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
2.304 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Apr 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Professional
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.00 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
72.00 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.608 TFLOPS
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.304 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
N18P-G61-MP2
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
30W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy