Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 60W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 34% (1785MHz vs 1335MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A500 Embedded +49%
5.468 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2022
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro Ampere-M
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

435 MHz
Base Clock
1575 MHz
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

42.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
85.44 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
5.468 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
5.468 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
85.44 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GA107S
GPU Name
TU117
-
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Turing
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
12 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
60W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy