Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1785MHz vs 1165MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 128.1GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro T2000 Mobile
3.656 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile +30%
4.772 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1575 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

57.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
114.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
7.311 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.656 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
114.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

60W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy