Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 49% (1733MHz vs 1163MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 180W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +396%
8.873 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

20
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
2560
Shading Units
768
160
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM206
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

180W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy