Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +3959%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Dec 2009
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
16
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT218
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
28W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy