Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +143%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM206
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy