Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +2927%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.360 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
58.88 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G84
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
G84-875-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
42W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy