Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M vs NVIDIA Tesla S2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M and 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 3GB)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 900W)
NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5100M +130%
2.369 TFLOPS
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
-
771 MHz
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
448
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.67 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
98.69 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.369 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
98.69 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GF100
N15E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
900W
-
Suggested PSU
1300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy